Daily research ·
BTC 1W skew relief outpaces ATM easing
BTC 1W options show reduced downside asymmetry alongside softer implied volatility. RR25 changed by +1.72 vol points [1], while ATM IV changed by -1.14 vol points [2]. The adjustment eases defensive pricing without eliminating the negative skew or the premium of 1W ATM volatility over 1M.
The reading
What the evidence says
BTC 1W options became less defensive over the matched daily interval. RR25, the call-versus-put IV asymmetry, changed by +1.72 vol points [1] to -2.72 vol points [3]. Its absolute daily move ranked at 96.2nd percentile [4] within the rolling historical comparison, 26 observations (observed sampling; 12 Oct 2026–08 Nov 2026) [4]. Meanwhile, 1W ATM, or at-the-money, IV changed by -1.14 vol points [2] to 39.22% [5]. The distinction matters: downside asymmetry eased, but negative 1W RR25 still indicates a put premium over calls.
BTC ATM easing was strongest at 1W, while skew relief extended through the nearer tenors. Over the same daily interval, 2W ATM IV changed by -0.60 vol points [6], and 1M ATM IV changed by -0.36 vol points [7] to 38.11% [8]. The current 1W ATM level therefore remains above 1M ATM despite the larger 1W decline. BTC 2W RR25 changed by +1.46 vol points [9] to -2.85 vol points [10], while 1M RR25 changed by +0.73 vol points [11] to -2.90 vol points [12]. This supports broader nearer-tenor skew relief, rather than an adjustment confined to 1W.
BTC butterfly premiums also narrowed beyond 1W, although the 1M adjustment was smaller. BF25 measures the average wing IV premium over ATM, rather than directional bias or absolute wing IV. Over the matched daily interval, 1W BF25 changed by -0.24 vol points [13] to 0.98 vol points [14]; 2W BF25 changed by -0.17 vol points [15] to 0.97 vol points [16]. BTC 1M BF25 changed by -0.03 vol points [17] to 1.09 vol points [18]. Thus, the butterfly adjustment was stronger at 1W and 2W, while the separate 1M RR25 improvement shows that directional repricing reached further than the strongest ATM easing.
BTC 1W options easing occurred despite a spot return of -1.12% [19] over the matched daily interval. Trailing weekly realized volatility, recomputed from retained minute prices, was 43.16% [20]; forward 1W ATM IV minus that realized measure was -3.94 vol points [21]. This qualifies the easing as an options repricing during spot weakness, rather than evidence that recent realized fluctuations had disappeared. Broader BTC implied-volatility measures also differed: model-free DS30 was 43.11 vol points [22], BVIV was 41.99 vol points [23], and BVIV minus DS30 was -1.12 vol points [24]. These independently timed benchmarks do not measure the same object as 1W ATM IV. Current-window reporting from Cointelegraph described earlier ETF withdrawals, alongside reported Strategy purchases; that mixed demand context does not identify the cause of the 1W skew adjustment.
Qualifications and limits
- BTC 9M RR25 changed by -0.03 vol points [25], a small opposing move that limits any claim of uniform skew relief across tenors.
- The historical rank describes absolute move magnitude within observed eligible samples, with gaps and selection retained; it does not establish statistical significance or joint unusualness. Options, news and benchmark observations have distinct clocks, and DS30 historical ingestion timing is unverified.
- Trailing realized volatility uses adjacent minute log returns with calendar-day annualization and complete measured coverage. Same-series recomputation does not independently verify prices; forward 1W IV and trailing realized volatility cover different periods, so their spread establishes neither a forecast nor a trading edge.
Further qualifications
- Reported fund withdrawals and corporate purchases concern earlier activity and lack primary flow reconciliation here. They cannot establish net institutional demand or explain the measured tenor changes.
Verified market snapshot
| Asset · tenor | ATM IV | ATM IV change | RR25 | RR25 change | BF25 change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC · 1W | 39.22 %[5] | -1.14 vol pts[2] | -2.72 vol pts[3] | 1.72 vol pts[1] | -0.24 vol pts[13] |
| BTC · 2W | 38.20 %[26] | -0.60 vol pts[6] | -2.85 vol pts[10] | 1.46 vol pts[9] | -0.17 vol pts[15] |
| BTC · 1M | 38.11 %[8] | -0.36 vol pts[7] | -2.90 vol pts[12] | 0.73 vol pts[11] | -0.03 vol pts[17] |
| BTC · 9M | 40.04 %[27] | -0.08 vol pts[28] | -2.07 vol pts[29] | -0.03 vol pts[25] | 0.06 vol pts[30] |
Weekly versus monthly curve
Recent ATM curve history
One-month minus one-week at-the-money implied volatility. Negative values mean an inverted curve. Each row retains its native observation time; missing days are not filled.
BTC ATM IV term structure
Scroll horizontally to see the full chart.
BTC observed 1M minus 1W ATM IV
Scroll horizontally to see the full chart.
BTC trailing 7d variance: entering and leaving returns
Scroll horizontally to see the full chart.
Full original chart detail
BTC RR25 curve
Figure sources: [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58]
BTC: size of daily changes in the 1-week call-minus-put volatility premium (RR25)
BF25 change by tenor
What to watch next
| Story component | Next snapshot | Observed condition | Comparison period | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC · 1W ATM implied volatility | 10 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | Current level: at or below 39.22 % (current level). Between current and prior: strictly above 39.22 % and strictly below 40.36 %. Prior level: at or above 40.36 % (prior level). | 08 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC → 09 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | [5] [31] [2] |
| BTC · 1W 25-delta risk reversal | 10 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | Current level: at or above -2.72 vol pts (current level). Between current and prior: strictly below -2.72 vol pts and strictly above -4.44 vol pts. Prior level: at or below -4.44 vol pts (prior level). | 08 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC → 09 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | [3] [59] [1] |
| BTC · 9M 25-delta risk reversal | 10 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | Current level: at or below -2.07 vol pts (current level). Between current and prior: strictly above -2.07 vol pts and strictly below -2.04 vol pts. Prior level: at or above -2.04 vol pts (prior level). | 08 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC → 09 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | [29] [83] [25] |
Historical sampling methodology
Each rank describes its supplied population. Exact consecutive daily endpoints use fixed UTC anchors and 24 elapsed hours, including across daylight-saving changes. Missing pairs are omitted without interpolation; their absence does not establish why the provider omitted them. Full captured history is bounded by this run. Different captures and windows can have different denominators even when their ranks agree.
| Measure | Population | Observed pairs or levels | Requested window | Excluded pair or level endpoints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC 1W.rr25.absolute_move[4] | rolling 30 calendar days (UTC) | 26 | 2026-10-09T17:31:00+00:00 to 2026-11-08T17:31:00+00:00 | 2026-10-10T17:31:00+00:00, 2026-10-11T17:31:00+00:00, 2026-10-22T17:31:00+00:00, 2026-10-23T17:31:00+00:00 |
Source reporting
- Strategy buys 1,036 Bitcoin as BTC holdings climb to 850,364 · Published 2026-11-09T13:29:47+00:00
- Bitcoin ETFs shed $1.3B in biggest weekly outflow since late June · Published 2026-11-09T08:17:35+00:00
BF25 = (25-delta call IV + 25-delta put IV) / 2 − ATM IV. Levels and changes are measured in volatility points.
Retrospective report: native market dates are distinct from later retrieval and run clocks. Later capture does not establish availability at the original cutoff.
Source notes
[1] BTC 1W RR25 difference
1.72 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[2] BTC 1W ATM IV difference
-1.14 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[3] BTC 1W RR25
-2.72 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[4] BTC 1W RR25 absolute move percentile
96.15 percentile
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[5] BTC 1W ATM IV
39.22 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[6] BTC 2W ATM IV difference
-0.60 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[7] BTC 1M ATM IV difference
-0.36 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[8] BTC 1M ATM IV
38.11 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[9] BTC 2W RR25 difference
1.46 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[10] BTC 2W RR25
-2.85 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[11] BTC 1M RR25 difference
0.73 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[12] BTC 1M RR25
-2.90 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[13] BTC 1W BF25 difference
-0.24 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[14] BTC 1W BF25
0.98 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[15] BTC 2W BF25 difference
-0.17 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[16] BTC 2W BF25
0.97 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[17] BTC 1M BF25 difference
-0.03 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[18] BTC 1M BF25
1.09 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[19] BTC spotPrice percentage change
-1.12 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[20] BTC rv7d.recomputed
43.16 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[21] BTC 1W atmIv-rv7d spread
-3.94 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[22] BTC btcVol.ds30
43.11 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[23] BTC btcVol.bviv
41.99 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[24] BTC btcVol.bvivMinusDs30
-1.12 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[25] BTC 9M RR25 difference
-0.03 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[26] BTC 2W ATM IV
38.20 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[27] BTC 9M ATM IV
40.04 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[28] BTC 9M ATM IV difference
-0.08 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[29] BTC 9M RR25
-2.07 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[30] BTC 9M BF25 difference
0.06 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[31] BTC 1W ATM IV
40.36 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[32] BTC 1M ATM IV
38.47 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[33] BTC 1M atmIv-1W.atmIv spread
-1.11 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:59:36.855967+00:00
[34] BTC 1M atmIv-1W.atmIv spread
-1.89 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:59:36.855967+00:00
[35] BTC 1M atmIv-1W.atmIv spread
-0.86 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:59:36.855967+00:00
[36] BTC 1M atmIv-1W.atmIv spread
-0.78 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:59:36.855967+00:00
[52] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[53] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[54] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[55] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[56] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[57] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[58] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[59] BTC 1W RR25
-4.44 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[83] BTC 9M RR25
-2.04 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Source data (JSON) · Surface metrics (CSV) · Evidence (JSON) · Report (JSON) · Report archive