Daily research ·
SOL ATM volatility repricing favors shorter tenors
SOL’s ATM volatility increase was strongest at 1W and extended through 2W and 1M, while 2M barely moved and 3M declined. The existing front-end premium therefore accompanies uneven repricing across maturities. Falling spot and measured trailing volatility provide context, but butterfly premiums and longer-tenor skew show that the adjustment differs by options measure.
The reading
What the evidence says
SOL’s shorter maturities showed the strongest increase in at-the-money implied volatility, or ATM IV. Over the crypto comparison window, 1W ATM IV changed by +4.71 vol points [1] to 61.73% [2], while 2W changed by +3.01 vol points [3] to 59.02% [4]. The increase extended to 1M, which changed by +1.08 vol points [5] to 57.18% [6]. By comparison, 2M changed by +0.15 vol points [7] to 56.42% [8], and 3M changed by -0.18 vol points [9]. The front-end premium was already present: at the previous snapshot, 1W ATM IV was 57.02% [10], above 2M at 56.27% [11]. The economic distinction is stronger near-term uncertainty pricing, with a meaningful extension into 2W and 1M rather than a uniform increase across maturities.
The shorter-tenor ATM increase accompanied a SOL spot return of -2.90% [12] over the same comparison window. Trailing realized volatility, recomputed from canonical minute returns on an annualized basis, measured 62.98% [13]; forward 1W ATM IV minus trailing realized volatility was -1.25 vol points [14]. Thus, the 1W ATM increase did not put forward implied volatility above the trailing realized measure. For historical perspective, the magnitude of the 2W ATM change had a full-captured-history percentile of 85.2nd percentile [15] within 54 observations (observed sampling; 10 Sep 2026–08 Nov 2026) [15]. That comparison describes the magnitude of the 2W move, not the rarity of the entire curve configuration.
Butterfly pricing showed a different pattern from ATM IV. BF25 measures the average wing IV premium over ATM: SOL 1W BF25 changed by -0.07 vol points [16] to 1.59 vol points [17], while 2W changed by +0.01 vol points [18] to 1.60 vol points [19], and 1M changed by +0.12 vol points [20] to 1.80 vol points [21]. These relatively small butterfly adjustments qualify the sharp 1W ATM increase: the 1W premium narrowed, but that does not establish declining absolute wing IV. Longer-tenor directional pricing also changed, with 3M RR25—call-versus-put IV asymmetry—changing by -0.63 vol points [22] from -0.26 vol points [23] to -0.89 vol points [24]. This deepened an existing 3M downside bias despite the slight 3M ATM decline. Separately, The Block reported Formation’s notification concerning a Solana securities venue. That prospective development establishes neither approval nor live usage, and offers no verified explanation for the stronger shorter-tenor ATM repricing.
Qualifications and limits
- Forward 1W implied volatility and trailing realized volatility cover different periods; their spread does not establish value, a forecast or a trading edge.
- Historical ranks describe selected observed samples, with missing dates and mixed clock availability limiting population coverage; they do not establish joint rarity. The 3M ATM move could not be ranked against matching history.
- Realized volatility uses adjacent canonical minute returns with complete observed coverage and no interpolation; same-series recomputation does not independently validate the underlying prices. News publication and market observation clocks do not establish causal attribution.
Verified market snapshot
| Asset · tenor | ATM IV | ATM IV change | RR25 | RR25 change | BF25 change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL · 1W | 61.73 %[2] | 4.71 vol pts[1] | -2.87 vol pts[25] | 0.52 vol pts[26] | -0.07 vol pts[16] |
| SOL · 2W | 59.02 %[4] | 3.01 vol pts[3] | -2.00 vol pts[27] | 0.54 vol pts[28] | 0.01 vol pts[18] |
| SOL · 1M | 57.18 %[6] | 1.08 vol pts[5] | -1.65 vol pts[29] | 0.05 vol pts[30] | 0.12 vol pts[20] |
| SOL · 2M | 56.42 %[8] | 0.15 vol pts[7] | -1.25 vol pts[31] | -0.39 vol pts[32] | 0.12 vol pts[33] |
| SOL · 3M | 56.01 %[34] | -0.18 vol pts[9] | -0.89 vol pts[24] | -0.63 vol pts[22] | 0.08 vol pts[35] |
Weekly versus monthly curve
Recent ATM curve history
One-month minus one-week at-the-money implied volatility. Negative values mean an inverted curve. Each row retains its native observation time; missing days are not filled.
SOL ATM IV term structure
Scroll horizontally to see the full chart.
SOL observed 1M minus 1W ATM IV
Scroll horizontally to see the full chart.
SOL trailing 7d variance: entering and leaving returns
Scroll horizontally to see the full chart.
Full original chart detail
SOL: size of daily changes in the 2-week at-the-money implied volatility
SOL BF25 curve
Figure sources: [48] [49] [50] [51] [52]
BF25 change by tenor
What to watch next
| Story component | Next snapshot | Observed condition | Comparison period | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL · 1W ATM implied volatility | 10 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | Current level: at or above 61.73 % (current level). Between current and prior: strictly below 61.73 % and strictly above 57.02 %. Prior level: at or below 57.02 % (prior level). | 08 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC → 09 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | [2] [10] [1] |
| SOL · 2W ATM implied volatility | 10 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | Current level: at or above 59.02 % (current level). Between current and prior: strictly below 59.02 % and strictly above 56.01 %. Prior level: at or below 56.01 % (prior level). | 08 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC → 09 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | [4] [41] [3] |
| SOL · 1W 25-delta risk reversal | 10 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | Current level: at or above -2.87 vol pts (current level). Between current and prior: strictly below -2.87 vol pts and strictly above -3.39 vol pts. Prior level: at or below -3.39 vol pts (prior level). | 08 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC → 09 Nov 2026 · 17:31 UTC | [25] [53] [26] |
Historical sampling methodology
Each rank describes its supplied population. Exact consecutive daily endpoints use fixed UTC anchors and 24 elapsed hours, including across daylight-saving changes. Missing pairs are omitted without interpolation; their absence does not establish why the provider omitted them. Full captured history is bounded by this run. Different captures and windows can have different denominators even when their ranks agree.
| Measure | Population | Observed pairs or levels | Requested window | Excluded pair or level endpoints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL 2W.atmIv.absolute_move[15] | full captured history | 54 | 2026-09-09T17:31:00+00:00 to 2026-11-08T17:31:00+00:00 | 2026-09-12T17:31:00+00:00, 2026-09-13T17:31:00+00:00, 2026-09-21T17:31:00+00:00, 2026-09-22T17:31:00+00:00, 2026-09-28T17:31:00+00:00, 2026-09-29T17:31:00+00:00 |
Source reporting
- Formation notifies SEC to operate first tokenized securities venue on Solana · Published 2026-11-09T12:30:00+00:00
BF25 = (25-delta call IV + 25-delta put IV) / 2 − ATM IV. Levels and changes are measured in volatility points.
Retrospective report: native market dates are distinct from later retrieval and run clocks. Later capture does not establish availability at the original cutoff.
Source notes
[1] SOL 1W ATM IV difference
4.71 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[2] SOL 1W ATM IV
61.73 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[3] SOL 2W ATM IV difference
3.01 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[4] SOL 2W ATM IV
59.02 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[5] SOL 1M ATM IV difference
1.08 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[6] SOL 1M ATM IV
57.18 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[7] SOL 2M ATM IV difference
0.15 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[8] SOL 2M ATM IV
56.42 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[9] SOL 3M ATM IV difference
-0.18 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[10] SOL 1W ATM IV
57.02 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[11] SOL 2M ATM IV
56.27 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[12] SOL spotPrice percentage change
-2.90 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[13] SOL rv7d.recomputed
62.98 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[14] SOL 1W atmIv-rv7d spread
-1.25 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[15] SOL 2W ATM IV absolute move percentile
85.19 percentile
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[16] SOL 1W BF25 difference
-0.07 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[17] SOL 1W BF25
1.59 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[18] SOL 2W BF25 difference
0.01 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[19] SOL 2W BF25
1.60 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[20] SOL 1M BF25 difference
0.12 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[21] SOL 1M BF25
1.80 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[22] SOL 3M RR25 difference
-0.63 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[23] SOL 3M RR25
-0.26 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[24] SOL 3M RR25
-0.89 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[25] SOL 1W RR25
-2.87 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[26] SOL 1W RR25 difference
0.52 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[27] SOL 2W RR25
-2.00 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[28] SOL 2W RR25 difference
0.54 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[29] SOL 1M RR25
-1.65 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[30] SOL 1M RR25 difference
0.05 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[31] SOL 2M RR25
-1.25 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[32] SOL 2M RR25 difference
-0.39 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[33] SOL 2M BF25 difference
0.12 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[34] SOL 3M ATM IV
56.01 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[35] SOL 3M BF25 difference
0.08 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[36] SOL 1M ATM IV
56.10 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[37] SOL 1M atmIv-1W.atmIv spread
-4.55 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:59:36.855967+00:00
[38] SOL 1M atmIv-1W.atmIv spread
-0.92 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:59:36.855967+00:00
[39] SOL 1M atmIv-1W.atmIv spread
-1.79 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:59:36.855967+00:00
[40] SOL 1M atmIv-1W.atmIv spread
-1.74 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:59:36.855967+00:00
[41] SOL 2W ATM IV
56.01 %
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
[48] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[49] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[50] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[51] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[52] Source
Source type: options-observations
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Open cited source[53] SOL 1W RR25
-3.39 vol pts
Source type: calculation
Observed: 2026-11-09T17:31:00+00:00
Source data (JSON) · Surface metrics (CSV) · Evidence (JSON) · Report (JSON) · Report archive